Title: Signature Rules
Shadow Stu-E - August 12, 2007 11:49 AM (GMT)
Do the rules from HPL still apply to applications for Custom Signatures? i.e most have posted more than 50/100 times? (cant remember the actual amount <blush> )
wickedwitch - August 12, 2007 05:05 PM (GMT)
As far as I know, we on TPL have never had any rules relating to custom signatures. If you would like one, all you have to do is post your request in this forum and Hobbes will do his finest <thumbsup>
Norbert - August 12, 2007 07:35 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (wickedwitch @ Aug 12 2007, 06:05 PM) |
| As far as I know, we on TPL have never had any rules relating to custom signatures. |
Apart from copyright and the unfortunate lack of womanly curvy bits.....
<thumbsup>
wickedwitch - August 12, 2007 08:02 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Norbert @ Aug 12 2007, 08:35 PM) |
| QUOTE (wickedwitch @ Aug 12 2007, 06:05 PM) | | As far as I know, we on TPL have never had any rules relating to custom signatures. |
Apart from copyright and the unfortunate lack of womanly curvy bits.....
<thumbsup>
|
Of course! What I meant was, we've never had any rules about the number of posts you have to make before you can have one! (which of course you knew!) <roflmao>
The STIG - August 12, 2007 08:55 PM (GMT)
wickedwitch - August 12, 2007 08:57 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (The STIG @ Aug 12 2007, 09:55 PM) |
| And keep them smallish. |
good point, which is why I suggested a request to Hobbes.
That way, he will keep them within all the guidelines.
stradlin22 - August 12, 2007 10:47 PM (GMT)
i used to have a sig with an moving picture
someone told me it was slowing down their browser when I had posted
it was a GIF file i believe
are they any guidelines on this??
Hobbes - August 13, 2007 06:30 AM (GMT)
So to summarise <peek>
No post restriction.
No smallish woman's curvy bits. (I guess the admin prefer the more well endowed woman, I'm saying nothing)
Signatures 500x150 or thereabouts please.
If you want a sig made Stu, just post a topic here with the details or drop me a PM.
As for the GIF Stradders, no idea, I guess it *may* affect dial-up users. Can a member of Admin clarify please....
Norbert - August 13, 2007 08:48 AM (GMT)
You can choose not to see sigs though.... I'm on ADSL max at my flat, which indicates only a fraction less than the 8mb upper limit (7616K to be precise, and uncontended too :) ) and it sometimes didn't display Strad's sig for a while, at my weekend home I get about 4mb (50:1 contention of thereabouts I believe), and occasionally it would time out. I measured the file at around 1mb if I recall correctly. On dialup, that's possibly a quarter to half an hour dending on the equipment and the line. I remember the joyous days of downloading stuff at 3.5kb/s. A few weeks back I did a 3.2GB disk image in an hour and quarter - it *averaged* 724kb/s!!
Norbert - August 13, 2007 09:00 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (stradlin22 @ Aug 12 2007, 11:47 PM) |
i used to have a sig with an moving picture
someone told me it was slowing down their browser when I had posted
it was a GIF file i believe
are they any guidelines on this?? |
Yup, the usual moving pics are animated gif files. While dialup is not really the norm these days, plenty of people will still be using it, maybe board members. Bearing in mind all the smilies, other people's sigs, avatars, banner etc, etc, there's a lot of stuff to download when first visiting, and if the user is a regular tidy-upper, then they may well clean their temp internet files out in which case they need to download them again. I'd suggest fixing a size limit on sigs - the site already does so for avatars. Not sure what to suggest, but a few hundred K ought to be sufficient.
I gues we could do a poll - what tyre of connection/browser/screen res etc do usuers use, and base subsequent site mods on the results?
Red Andy - August 13, 2007 10:56 AM (GMT)
Alternatively we could attach a disclaimer in the "Please Read this Before You Post" section, saying that users with slower Internet connections (i.e. dialup) are advised to turn off signatures and avatars, because some users may be using animated sigs that can slow down your browser catastrophically.
Paul_Murtagh - August 13, 2007 11:40 AM (GMT)
Is it just me, or have the rules on custom signatures expanded as this thread has went on? <roflmao>
Norbert - August 13, 2007 05:17 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Red Andy @ Aug 13 2007, 11:56 AM) |
| some users may be using animated sigs that can slow down your browser catastrophically. |
Of couse, a bigger catastrophe to have to put up with would be an animated STIG!!!
<yikes> <yikes> <roflmao> <roflmao>
<peek>
rickyclean - August 14, 2007 08:30 AM (GMT)
No womanly curvy bits? This is outrageous I demand to see my lawyer!! <admin>
Lex - August 30, 2008 07:11 AM (GMT)
*wonders how Ricky got on at his Lawyer's and wonders if she is a woman too*
<devil>